Why businesses need Explainable AI and how to deliver it

Businesses increasingly rely on artificial intelligence (AI) systems to make decisions that touch individual lives, safety, and fairness. But many of those affected by AI, including customers, employees, partners, or regulators, don’t understand how AI arrived at a decision. That gap threatens trust, which in turn can block adoption or even lead to legal trouble. To get the benefits of AI and avoid risk, companies should invest in explainable AI: systems that users can understand and that allow oversight.

In this blog, we'll dive into why explainable AI matters and share how to deliver it, in ways that aren’t overly technical, but are practical.

‍

Why Explainable AI matters

‍

Increasing dependence on AI

More companies are using AI in products, services, operations. Whether it’s recommending medical treatments, approving loans, screening resumes, or personalizing content, the decisions made by AI impact real people. When AI is a “black box,” people are uneasy. They ask: Why was I rejected? Why did I get this score?

‍

Trust and adoption

If users don’t understand how AI makes decisions, they may not trust it. That reduces adoption. In regulated industries like healthcare, finance, HR, regulators also demand explanations. For many clients, having explainability in AI is now a non-negotiable part of procurement. Trust leads to loyalty, reduced friction, better reputation.

‍

Legal, ethical, and reputational risk

Without good explanations, companies risk violating laws or ethical norms. Discrimination (even unintentional) is a danger. If datasets are biased or the model’s logic favors one group over another, harm follows. Also, public backlash over opaque AI can harm reputation, even lead to fines. Regulations (existing or emerging) often require some degree of explainability.

‍

Better internal decision‐making

Explainability isn’t just for external users. Internally, when people understand how models work, they can spot issues, fix them faster, improve models. It also helps teams align on goals: business objectives, fairness, safety. It helps with debugging, auditing, and continuous improvement.

‍

What Explainable AI means in practice

‍

Explainable AI (often called XAI) means systems and processes that allow humans to see why a model reached a given output or recommendation. Key parts include:

• Transparency: Clear, open information on how recommendations are made. What inputs matter, what data was used, what algorithms or rules are involved.
• Explainability: Tools or methods that show what features or inputs contributed to a decision—for example, which patient symptoms led to a diagnosis prediction; or which financial metrics influenced a credit score.
• Audit trails: Logging decisions, predictions, inputs and changes over time. So you can review, correct mistakes, or override decisions if needed.
• Bias checking and fairness: Ensuring datasets do not contain unfair bias (e.g. by gender, race, age) and testing models to detect bias. Monitoring outputs to spot bias after deployment.

‍

How to deliver Explainable AI

‍

Here are practical steps companies can take to build explainability. These are non‐technical enough that decision makers, managers, and product teams can lead or understand them.

‍

1. Define who needs explanations and why

Start by asking: who will see the explanations, and for what purpose? Possible audiences:

• End users (patients, customers, employees) who are directly affected
• Operators or staff who use tools and need to interpret outputs
• Regulators or auditors who may demand proof of fairness or decision logic
• Business stakeholders ensuring objectives (profit, safety, compliance)

Each group needs different kinds of explanations. A customer denied a loan needs clear reasons; a data team needs deeper insight into model behavior; auditors may need both documentation and evidence of fairness tests.

‍

2. Establish a governance framework

Make policies and roles for how AI is built, reviewed, monitored. Some ideas:

• An AI governance committee with representatives from legal, ethics, product, data science
• Rules about how to document data sources, model changes, decision logic
• Review checkpoints: before deployment, after deployment, for high‐risk use cases

Governance ensures someone is accountable.

‍

3. Use suitable tools and techniques

To give real explanations, companies can adopt existing open source tools and libraries. Examples:

• LIME (Local Interpretable Model‐Agnostic Explanations) helps explain individual predictions by approximating model behavior locally. restack.io+2mediafutureseu.github.io+2
• SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) shows contributions of features to predictions in a theoretically grounded way. restack.io+1
• InterpretML is a framework that helps with both glassbox models (models that are inherently interpretable) and blackbox explanations. mediafutureseu.github.io+1
• AI Explainability 360 toolkit from Trusted‑AI gives several algorithms for different types of explanations and data contexts. mediafutureseu.github.io+1
• Alibi library provides both local and global explanation methods. mediafutureseu.github.io+1

Choose tools that match your use case: do you need explanations in real time? For each decision or just summary trends? Who will read them?

‍

4. Build auditability and logging

• Store what inputs went into a decision, what model version was used, what output was given.
• Log when models are updated, retrained, or changed.
• Allow for override or correction—for example, a human can challenge or reverse a decision.

These audit trails help when stakeholders ask “why was this decision made?” and help in correcting mistakes or bias later.

‍

5. Test for bias, fairness, and unintended consequences

• Before deployment, run tests on your data to look for bias. For example, check if certain demographic groups are systematically disadvantaged.
• Monitor in production: collect feedback, examine outcomes. If something seems off (e.g. certain groups keep getting worse outcomes), investigate.
• Use fairness metrics/tools. Use counterfactual evaluations, simulations, sample audits.

‍

6. Communicate clearly

• Translate explanations into language your users understand. Avoid jargon. For example: “Because your credit history had late payments” rather than “feature weight on historic time delinquencies exceeded threshold”.
• Visual tools help: charts, feature importance graphs, simple illustrations.
• Provide interface elements: explanations built into UI—“Why this?” buttons, tooltips.

‍

7. Maintain and update explanation capabilities

Explainability is not a one‑off. Models change, datasets change, requirements evolve. So:

• Regularly review whether explanations are still accurate and useful
• Update documentation and communication as models or policies shift
• Train staff in interpreting explanations and spotting issues

‍

Two areas to focus on to maximize benefits and minimize risk

‍

From above, actions cluster in two essential areas. If companies act well in these, they will gain trust, compliance, and better outcomes.

‍

A. Governance and Organizational Processes

This includes:

• Having policies and committees that enforce explainability standards
• Defining roles: who owns the model’s behavior, who monitors, who responds to user questions or complaints
• Building documentation and metadata: what data was used, how it’s preprocessed, how model decisions are weighted

Strong governance means risk is identified early, decisions are consistent, accountability is clear.

‍

B. Tools, Techniques, and Technical Choices

This includes:

• Picking models that are more interpretable when possible (glassbox models)
• Using explainability tools (LIME, SHAP, InterpretML, etc.) to offer insight into black box models
• Building audit trails and version control
• Testing for bias and fairness

When both the organizational side and technical side are strong, explainability is more complete, and risk is much lower.

‍

Real‐world examples & case uses

‍

Here are illustrative examples (anonymized, simplified) that show how explainable AI helps.

• Finance / Credit: A bank uses an AI model to decide loan approvals. Without explainability, customers reject the process as opaque. With SHAP or LIME, the bank can show which factors (income, credit history, debt ratio) pushed a decision towards rejection. If data shows bias (e.g. certain neighborhoods get worse outcomes), the bank can adjust or flag that.
• Healthcare: An AI tool predicts patient risk for a disease. Clinicians want not only predictions but reasons (e.g. age, symptoms, lab results). By showing contributions of different inputs, doctors can better trust and act on the prediction; also can check whether model is relying on spurious features like demographic proxies.
• HR / Hiring: An AI that ranks candidates must ensure it is not unfair to particular groups. Explainability lets HR see if a model is overemphasizing particular resume features. If bias is found (e.g. against non‐traditional education), the model can be adjusted.

‍

Challenges & trade‑offs

‍

Explainable AI is very helpful—but it has challenges, which need to be managed.

• Complexity vs interpretability: Some of the most accurate models (deep learning, ensembles) are inherently harder to interpret. Simplifying for the sake of explainability may reduce performance.
• Overfitting explanations: Sometimes tools generate explanations that look plausible but are misleading or unstable. Users might over‑trust them.
• Cost / effort: Building good logging, building UI for users, running fairness tests takes time, people, budget.
• Regulatory uncertainty: Laws are evolving. What counts as a “good explanation” may change. What’s acceptable in one jurisdiction may not be in another.
• User comprehension: Even with explanations, many users won’t understand technical details. The communication must be tailored.

‍

Steps to start (action plan)

‍

Here’s a simple roadmap businesses can follow to begin delivering explainable AI.

1. Audit your current AI systems
   List all use‑cases where AI makes decisions. For each, note who is affected, what data is used, what model type, whether explanations exist today.
2. Set your explainability goals
   For each use case, decide what level of explanation is needed: user‑facing vs technical vs legal; local (each decision) vs global (overall behavior).
3. Choose tools & build infrastructure
   Pick from open source libraries (LIME, SHAP, AI Explainability 360, etc.). Also build logging, version control, data lineage.
4. Design user‑friendly explanation UI
   Embed explanation features in your product: “Why this?” buttons, visual breakdowns, dashboards.
5. Test for fairness & bias
   Run tests, get human feedback, monitor outcomes. Adjust if needed.
6. Governance & policy setup
   Define committee, assign responsibility, set review schedules, document everything.
7. Continuous monitoring and update
   Review models, ensure explanations still accurate; monitor regulatory changes; retrain or adjust models over time.

‍

Conclusion

‍

As AI continues to inform more decisions (some lifesaving, some life‑changing), making those systems understandable is no longer optional. Explainable AI builds trust, helps avoid costly risks (legal, ethical, reputational), and enables better internal alignment and product success. By focusing on two areas - governance/organizational processes, and technical tools/choices - businesses can both maximize benefits and minimize risk. Start small, with clear goals, suitable tools, good documentation, and listening to users. Over time, explainability becomes part of how you design, build, and use AI. That is what separates companies that succeed with AI from those that struggle.

‍

If you want help building an AI-powered product from scratch, book a free strategy session with Codelevate. We help founders build solutions that work - fast.